Write short notes on live streaming

2.1.1 Principles of Natural Justice The two pillars (+ the third modern): Nemo judex in causa sua — the rule against bias: no one a judge in his own cause; the bias tests (the pecuniary-and-personal interest; the real-likelihood-of-bias doctrine); the institutional-bias questions; the court's-and-tribunal's composition discipline; Audi alteram partem — the hearing rule: hear the other side — the notice (the grounds- and-time adequacy), the opportunity to be heard (the evidence's disclosure, the representation), the reasoned decision (the reason-giving's modern rise); The hearing's fairness content (the modern elaboration): the evidence-disclosure; the cross-examination where credibility decisive; the legal-representation; the reasoned decision. The Nepali application — the classic: Parsuram Banjade v. Durgadas Shrestha, Bagmati Special Court, Kathmandu & Others (NKP 2027, No. 7, P . 157, D.No. 547) — the habeas corpus- and-natural-justice ruling: the delegate vested with quasi-judicial power could not act as judge in his own cause; the detention-and-statement-taking in violation of the fair-process guarantees; the Supreme Court's order (the release-and-compensation line) — Nepal's oldest-and-clearest natural-justice precedent — the nemo judex rule's Nepali anchor. The principle's reach: the judicial, quasi-judicial and administrative decisions alike; the constitutional anchoring (Article 20(9)'s "impartial, independent and competent court" — natural justice constitutionalized); the limits (the statutory exceptions; the emergency's edges; the pure- administrative-policy latitude). 2.1.2 Locus Standi The classical rule: the injured party's standing…