7.2 Review and Revision Proceedings

The residual remedies — the correction routes after the judgment. A. Review The review of a court's own decisions (Art 133's jurisdiction list for the SC; heard by a different bench): the narrow gates — Error apparent on the face of the record (the manifest slip, not an argued alternative); The discovery of new matters (the evidence or facts that could not be produced despite diligence); Any other sufficient reason in the interest of justice. By application within the rules' time; the coram's care — the bench that reviews is not the bench that decided. Review is exceptional: it protects the court from its own manifest slips, not the parties from adverse results — it is not a second appeal in disguise. B. Revision The revision — the higher court's statutory supervision over subordinate courts where no appeal lies: errors of law apparent on the record, jurisdictional excess, the illegality's face. By application (the procedure codes' revision discipline); the court's options: examine, call for the record, confirm/correct/set aside — legality's patrol without merits' re-trial (Unit 3.5A). The revisional court does not re-appreciate evidence; it asks whether the lower court stayed within the law's lines. C. The two compared (the exam table) Point Review Revision Target the court's own decision a subordinate court's decision Bench a different bench of the same…