The machinery: the burden's evidentiary shifts through the trial — the plaintiff's prima facie case (the burden of production met) → the defendant's answering evidence (the burden passes to the defendant to go forward) → the plaintiff's rebuttal — the tennis-match's rhythm, while the legal burden stays with the party who bears it. The shift's triggers: the presumption's operation (the basic fact proved — the presumed fact's burden passes to the opponent: the presumption of innocence's reverse face; the regularity presumption; the special laws' reversals of 6.4); the affirmative defence's pleading (the defendant who pleads payment, alibi's indications, or insanity assumes the going-forward duty on those facts); the statutory reversals (the special laws placing the legal burden itself on the accused — the constitutionality debates). The rule to memorise: the evidentiary burden dances; the legal burden (in the ordinary case) stays home.
6.2 Shifting of Burden
यो उत्तर युनिट 6 मा छ — सुरुवात निःशुल्क, पूरा उत्तर प्याकेजमा।
🔒
यहीँबाट पूरा उत्तर
यो उत्तर The machinery: the burden's evidentiary shifts… … बाट अगाडि बाँकी छ। प्याकेज सक्रिय गरेपछि यही पेजमै पूरा पढ्न पाइन्छ — PDF छैन, अनलाइनमा मात्र।
- रु. ३०० · ३० दिन · एउटा प्याकेज
- हरेक विषयको पहिलो युनिट निःशुल्क
- फोनमै पढ्ने, बुकमार्क राख्ने
पहिले निःशुल्क युनिट पढेर हेर्नुहोस् — नहेरी किन्नु पर्दैन।
यही युनिटका अरू उत्तर
- 6.1 General Concept
- Distinguish the legal burden from the evidentiary burden, and explain the shifting of the burden.
- (10) How do the special laws — corruption, narcotics, trafficking — alter the burden of proof?
- Discuss with the constitutional discipline.
नोट AI-सहयोगमा बनेका हुन्; मुद्दाको नाम, मिति र धारा पाठ्यपुस्तक र नेपाल कानून पत्रिकासँग आफै जाँच्नुहोस्।