The second pillar — the hijacking's suppression (the offence's definition): The offence's definition: the unlawful seizure — the force-or-threat aboard to seize-or- exercise-the-control of the aircraft (the in-flight requirement: the doors-closed-to-the-doors- opened formula); The jurisdiction's cascade: the flag state's compulsory jurisdiction + the landing state's duty (the aircraft lands with the alleged offender aboard → the state must exercise jurisdiction) + the custody's-and-prosecute-or-extradite discipline (the aut dedere aut judicare: the offender found on the territory must be prosecuted or extradited); The hijacker's non-immunity (the political-offence exception's denial: the extradition's political-character bar excluded for the hijacking — the treaty's hard core); The aircraft-and-passengers' return (the Tokyo duty's strengthening).
5.3 The Hague Convention, 1970
यो उत्तर युनिट 5 मा छ — सुरुवात निःशुल्क, पूरा उत्तर प्याकेजमा।
🔒
यहीँबाट पूरा उत्तर
यो उत्तर The second pillar — the hijacking's… … बाट अगाडि बाँकी छ। प्याकेज सक्रिय गरेपछि यही पेजमै पूरा पढ्न पाइन्छ — PDF छैन, अनलाइनमा मात्र।
- रु. ३०० · ३० दिन · एउटा प्याकेज
- हरेक विषयको पहिलो युनिट निःशुल्क
- फोनमै पढ्ने, बुकमार्क राख्ने
पहिले निःशुल्क युनिट पढेर हेर्नुहोस् — नहेरी किन्नु पर्दैन।
यही युनिटका अरू उत्तर
- 5.1 Meaning of Aerial Piracy/Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft
- Explain the unlawful seizure of aircraft and the three-convention architecture of Tokyo, Hague and Montreal.
- (15) How does the international law ensure the hijacker's prosecution?
- Discuss the jurisdiction's cascade.
नोट AI-सहयोगमा बनेका हुन्; मुद्दाको नाम, मिति र धारा पाठ्यपुस्तक र नेपाल कानून पत्रिकासँग आफै जाँच्नुहोस्।