The doctrine: upon incorporation the company becomes a person in law separate from its members — the capstone authority Salomon v. Salomon (the company a distinct person; the member not the company; the incorporation's certificate as the legal birth). The consequences (the doctrine's gifts): the company owns its own property (the members own only their shares — different things); it sues and is sued in its own name; it contracts in its own name; perpetual succession (members come and go, the company continues); limited liability (the member's exposure capped at the unpaid amount on the shares). The Nepali authority (the modern application): Sumargi Parajuli vs. Himalaya Spring Water, NKP 2074, Vol. 5, D.N. 9809, p. 829 — the personality landmark: the shareholders personally agreed to sell their shares and "the industry"; the Supreme Court held that the company and its shareholders are separate legal persons — a shareholders' personal agreement, without the company's own authorisation, cannot bind the company; shares are the holders' personal property, but the company's assets are the company's — a share transfer does not carry the company's property. (Read with Unit 10's cases.)
Discuss (b) alter ego
यो उत्तर युनिट 3 मा छ — सुरुवात निःशुल्क, पूरा उत्तर प्याकेजमा।
🔒
यहीँबाट पूरा उत्तर
यो उत्तर The doctrine: upon incorporation the company… … बाट अगाडि बाँकी छ। प्याकेज सक्रिय गरेपछि यही पेजमै पूरा पढ्न पाइन्छ — PDF छैन, अनलाइनमा मात्र।
- रु. ३०० · ३० दिन · एउटा प्याकेज
- हरेक विषयको पहिलो युनिट निःशुल्क
- फोनमै पढ्ने, बुकमार्क राख्ने
पहिले निःशुल्क युनिट पढेर हेर्नुहोस् — नहेरी किन्नु पर्दैन।
यही युनिटका अरू उत्तर
- 3.1 Concept of Separate Legal Personality
- Explain the concept of separate legal personality and its consequences, with reference to Salomon v.
- Discuss (a) perpetual succession
- Discuss (c) Royal British Bank v
नोट AI-सहयोगमा बनेका हुन्; मुद्दाको नाम, मिति र धारा पाठ्यपुस्तक र नेपाल कानून पत्रिकासँग आफै जाँच्नुहोस्।