12.2 The Five Prescribed Cases

(1) Binaya Kumar Upadhaya vs. Mina Sherchan (NKP 2075, No. 8, D.N. 10065) — report-first The frame: the current era (2075 B.S. = 2018/19 A.D.); an individual-vs-individual case in the banking list (the parties' pattern suggesting a transactional dispute with a banking dimension — the loan, the security, or the account's interface). Read the NKP report. (2) Sagar Sharma vs. Taxpayer Service Office (NKP 2075, No. 8, D.N. 1004[?]) — report-first The frame: the current era; the taxpayer-vs-office case (the tax administration's dispute in the banking list — the tax-and-banking interface (the account's information, the payment's faces — Unit 5.2's secrecy-and-disclosure themes' possible home)). The citation note: the syllabus's printed decision number is OCR-garbled ("D.N. 1004") — verify the exact number in the NKP volume itself. Read the NKP report. (3) Padam Kumar Medhasi Shah vs. Universal Finance Ltd. (NKP 2073, D.N. 9578) — report-first The frame: the 2073 B.S. (2016/17 A.D.) era — the BAFIA 2073's birth-year; the customer-vs- FINANCE COMPANY case (the finance-company world: the loan-and-recovery dispute the likely setting (Unit 7's themes)). Read the NKP report. (4) Advocate Lal Bahadur Basnet vs. Government of Nepal (NKP 2073, No. 3, D.N. 9357) — report-first The frame: the same era; the advocate-vs-Government writ (the public-law face of banking — the regulation's challenge, the sector's governance, or the rights' questions…