The distinction (the examiner's trap): equity infra legem (within the law — equity as interpretation and tempering: the ICJ's continental-shelf equitable delimitation — "equity as part of the law," not against it) vs. ex aequo et bono (deciding on the merits of fairness against orbeyond law) — permitted only by the parties' consent (Article 38(2): "if the parties agree thereto" — never yet used by the ICJ; the PCIJ's declined invitation standing as the practice). Equity's functions: delimitation (maritime boundaries' equitable principles), mitigation of rigour, gap-filling — the permanent tension between certainty and fairness that this source institutionalizes.
7 Equity, Justice and Good Conscience (Ex Aequo et Bono)
यो उत्तर युनिट 2 मा छ — सुरुवात निःशुल्क, पूरा उत्तर प्याकेजमा।
🔒
यहीँबाट पूरा उत्तर
यो उत्तर The distinction (the examiner's trap): equity… … बाट अगाडि बाँकी छ। प्याकेज सक्रिय गरेपछि यही पेजमै पूरा पढ्न पाइन्छ — PDF छैन, अनलाइनमा मात्र।
- रु. ३०० · ३० दिन · एउटा प्याकेज
- हरेक विषयको पहिलो युनिट निःशुल्क
- फोनमै पढ्ने, बुकमार्क राख्ने
पहिले निःशुल्क युनिट पढेर हेर्नुहोस् — नहेरी किन्नु पर्दैन।
यही युनिटका अरू उत्तर
- 1 The Statutory Frame: Article 38(1) ICJ Statute
- Explain the sources of international law under Article 38 of the ICJ Statute.
- What is international custom?
- Explain its elements with reference to the North Sea Continental Shelf cases and the persistent-objector rule.
नोट AI-सहयोगमा बनेका हुन्; मुद्दाको नाम, मिति र धारा पाठ्यपुस्तक र नेपाल कानून पत्रिकासँग आफै जाँच्नुहोस्।