Explain the principles of natural justice with Parsuram Banjade's case.

Jurisdiction — the court's power to hear-and-decide: the competence's grid. The classifications (the exam's map): 1. By subject-matter (territorium materiae): civil, criminal, constitutional (the writ powers), the specialized competence (the Special Court's corruption-and-organized crime; the juvenile; the revenue tribunal's tax line — the statute's allocations); 2. By territory: the district of the cause-and-parties (the codes' venue rules; the property suits' situs rule — where the land lies); 3. By value (pecunia): the small-claims-and-summary jurisdictions by amount; 4. By stage: original / appellate / revisional / review — the Nepali ladder (the district's originality; the High Court's appellate-and-original-writ; the Supreme Court's appellate-extraordinary- review — Articles 133–144's verified map); 5. The jurisdictional discipline: ultra vires the nullity rule (no jurisdiction = no validity, however excellent the reasoning — the excess-court's decree void); the objection-timing (the jurisdiction challenged at the earliest — the waiver doctrine); the sub bono judice questions (the proper-forum doctrine; the transfer machinery — Articles 134/145's impartiality transfers). The prescribed authority: Kallu Tharu (Chaudhary) v. Appellate Court, Dipayal Doti & Others (NKP 2060, No. 3/4, P. 317, D.No. 7209) — the land-tenancy writ: the Supreme Court's jurisdictional discipline — the proper channel for challenging the appellate court's decision being the statutory review-and-appeal routes (the then-Justice Administration Act 2048's frame), not the writ; the writ petition quashed: the extra-ordinary jurisdiction's channel-…