Discuss (d) Survival of actions

The strict liability's classic (the famous reservoir case's rule): the dangerous thing's escape — the land's non-natural use — the liability without fault (the three exceptions: the plaintiff's default, the act of God, the stranger's act — plus the consent, statutory authority and common benefit faces). The absolute liability's modern turn (the Bhopal-era rule, by the case's name): the hazardous-and-inherently-dangerous activity's liability — no exceptions (the enterprise's full answer; the social cost's internalisation). The distinction (the exam's discriminator): strict = no-fault with defences; absolute = no-fault, no defences. The product liability's face: the consumers' strict-liability doctrine (the defective product's answer — the U5–U6 bridge). The Nepal faces: the environmental wrongs' strict faces (the Environmental Law interface — LAW5603), the consumer regime's defective-goods machinery, the Civil Code 2074's liability provisions.