The gap's-diagnosis (the exam's essay):
1. The fragmentation's-problem: the scattered-sources (the constitution's-and-the-sector-acts' (the one-group-one-statute's-patchwork (the no-unifying-inclusion-statute))); the implementation's-unevenness (the machinery's-diffusion (the commissions'-proliferation-with- the-power's-weakness (the LAW5605-U8's-ombudsman-companion))).
2. The comprehensive's-case: the standards'-consolidation (the single-inclusion-code (the definitions'-and-the-remedies'-coherence)); the obligations'-clarification (the public-and- private's (the due-diligence's-domestication)); the monitoring's-strengthening (the indicators'- and-the-data's (the disaggregated's-mandate (the SDG's-echo))); the remedies'-access (the one-window's (the specialised-procedures' (the language-and-cost's-barriers'-removal))).
3. The design's-questions: the code's-vs-the-sector's (the codification's-benefit-vs-the- specificity's-loss); the commission's-consolidation (the one-strong-body-vs-the-many- community-voices (the representation's-tension)); the reservation's-design (the sunset's-and- the-creamy's (the U4.1's)); the intersection's-mind (the multiple-identity's-remedy (the Dalit- woman's-double-quota-lore (the local-election's-2017's-pioneering (the design's-lesson))).