6.4 Notable Case Law of Nepal

The SC's refugee-jurisprudence (the mandate-refugee detention line — the non-refoulement's judicial recognition): 1. Abdi Fahad Yusuf v. Department of Immigration et al. (NKP 2077 B.S., Vol 5, D.No. 10503) — the Somali-citizen case (the celebrated face of the line: the detained-mandate- refugee's release-and-protection (the non-refoulement's application notwithstanding the non- party status (read the decision for the precise holdings))). 2. Abdul Khali v. Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers et al. (NKP 2068 B.S., Vol 9, D.No. 8684) — the Pakistani-citizen case (the detention-and-removal context (the mandate-status-and-liberty questions (read the decision for the precise holdings))). 3. Hadi Havir Habib v. Ministry of Home Affairs of Government of Nepal et al. (NKP 2066 B.S., Vol 1, D.No. 8055) — the Iraqi-citizen case (the same cluster's earlier face (the status-recognition-and-release (read the decision for the precise holdings))). 4. Mohamod Rasid v. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Nepal et al. (NKP 2064 B.S., Vol 6, D.No. 7860) — the Pakistani-citizen case (the line's early member (read the decision for the precise holdings)). The line's significance (the honest summary): the SC's mandamus-release practice for the detained mandate-refugees; the non-refoulement's domestic recognition (the international-principle absorption); the convention-ratification's judicial nudges (the dicta's faces (the honest note: the exhortations-not-orders)).