6.7 Recognition and Enforcement of Investment Awards

1. The ICSID's-own (the Art-54 (the every-Contracting-State (the as-final (the no-exequatur (the domestic-execution-rules (the exam's-54-strength)))); 2. The non-ICSID's (the NY-Convention (the 1958 (the Nepal-1988 (the verified (the grounds (the V (the narrow (the public-policy (the enforcement-Nepal-cases (the Hanil-line (the cross-noted-in- LAW5704 (the exam's-NY-face)))))))))); 3. The sovereign-immunity-barrier (the execution-vs-the-assets (the commercial-assets-only (the state-immunity-act-faces (the enforcement-jurisdictions (the exam's-hard-part (the award-won- the-asset-chase (the honest-hard-note)))))); The prescribed cases (cited verbatim; honest notes): Ncell v. Nepal Government (Supreme Court Larger Full Bench, 076-WO-0944) — the famous capital-gains-tax-and-telecom-investment case (read the decision for the precise facts-and-holdings); Dwarikanath Dhungel et al. v. Large Taxpayers Office (074- WO-0475); Renold's Holding Ltd v. Large Taxpayers Office (074-WF-0094); Arun Kumar Ojha v. Ministry of Finance, Singha Durbar, Kathmandu (NKP 2078 B.S., Poush, D.No. 10732); Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. v. High Court Patan (NKP 2079 B.S., Kartik, D.No. 10904) (also prescribed in Private International Law (LAW5704) — cross-noted there); and Hanil Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. Appellate Court Patan (NKP 2075 B.S., D.No. 10138) (also prescribed in LAW5704) — the foreign-investor- and-the-tax/dispute-era's-cluster (read each decision for the precise facts-and-holdings).