8.8 Prescribed Cases (as listed in the syllabus — cite verbatim)

1. Tax Office Biratnagar vs. Mahendra Kumar Golchha, NKP (2063 B.S.), No. 7, P. 871. 2. Laxman Narayan vs. Tax Office Lalitpur, NKP (2064 B.S.), No. 6, P. 758. 3. Sudarshanlal Shrestha vs. Internal Revenue Office, Chitwan, NKP (2065 B.S.), No. 3, P. 320. 4. Mittal Tea Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Internal Revenue Department, NKP (2066 B.S.), No. 6, P. 1001. 5. Sita Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs. Internal Revenue Office, Kathmandu, NKP (2066 B.S.), No. 8, P. 1350. 6. Meena Shakya vs. Internal Revenue Office, NKP (2068 B.S.), No. 5, P. 855. 7. Pro-Biotech Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Large Taxpayer Office, Lalitpur, NKP (2068 B.S.), No. 1, P. 145. 8. Thula Kardata Karyalaya Harihar Bhawan vs. Rajkumar Golchha, NKP 2069 B.S., No. 7, Dec. 8862, p. 1272. 9. Thula Kardata Karyalaya Harihar Bhawan vs. Prime International Pvt. Ltd., NKP 2069 B.S., No. 11, Dec. 8914. 10. Dwarikanath Dungel et.al vs. Thula Kardata Karyalaya Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur (Ncell Case), Largest full bench, Case No. 074-WO-0475, Decision Date 2075/10/23. 11. Advocate Archana Silwal vs. IRD Lazimpat, Case No. 077-NF-0035, Decision Date 2080.10.16 (Full Bench, Bhatbhateni Case). Placement notes (honest): • Cases 1–9 concern assessments, penalties, and recovery disputes between taxpayers and the revenue offices/departments named in the citations — the daily bread of Unit 8's appeal map. Their holdings should be…