6.3 The External Evaluation (120 marks — 60%)

The examiner: the independent (the external (the campus's-own-not-the-only-judge (the U1's- design-recalled)))); The criteria (the examiner's-likely-rubric): the originality (the contribution-real (the U2's-gap-answered)) + the rigour (the method-sound (the U4's-chain-intact)) + the analysis (the critical-not-the-descriptive (the why-asked-repeatedly (the strengths-and- weaknesses-and-ambiguities-and-reform — the U1's-four-lens))) + the sources (the verified (the fabricated-the-disqualifying)) + the writing (the clear (the structured (the cited-consistently))) + the recommendations (the constructive (the implementable)); The outcomes: the passed (the marks-awarded (the celebrate))) / the revise-and-resubmit-lore (the institution's-rules (the remediable-flaws (the second-chance (the not-the-disgrace (the process)))) / the failed (the rare (the catastrophic-only (the plagiarism-the-chief-cause (the U3.3's-ethics-the-ultimate-practical- exam))));