4 The Prescribed Cases — Nepal's Election-Law Jurisprudence

1. — the earliest cluster's prescribed decision (the first-elections-era report — the 1959-and-Panchayat twilight's election litigation); read the report and cite with the syllabus's own citation.2. — the post-1990 party-and-commission cluster (the 1991–1994 era's disputes — the party's-and-candidacy's faces before the Commission); read the report and cite with the syllabus's citation.3. — the same era's companion (the EC's decision's judicial review); read the report and cite with the syllabus's citation.4. — the ethnic-minority party's-and- organisation's electoral-recognition face (the party's own president the petitioner — the registration-and-recognition disputes' illustration); read the report and cite with the syllabus's citation.5. — the mid-1990s' parliament-and-dissolution turbulence era's litigation (the House's life-and-membership faces); read the report and cite with the syllabus's citation.6. — the pre-CA-era dispute against the Commission (the Tharu-lawyer-and-activist's challenge — the representation-and-roll faces of the transition era); read the report and cite with the syllabus's citation.7. — verified: the post-2022 PR-system petition (the 121 PR-elected members' challenge); the Constitutional Bench dismissed the writ (the members validly elected under the law) but ordered the PR law's amendment — the Court emphasising the primacy of the proportional-inclusion rights (Articles 18(3), 38(4), 40(1), 42(1)) and warning against the elected bodies' elite capture: the system-reform jurisprudence's capstone.8. — verified: the CA-election era's disqualification case — Section 19(g) of the Constituent Verify every citation yourself — do…