6.2 Nepal's Obligation under International Human Rights Laws Relevant toRefugee Protection

1. The treaty's floor (the party-status record): the ICCPR-ICESCR (the 1991 accession); the CAT (the first-South-Asian party (the Art-3-type removal protections)); the CRC; the CEDAW; the RPD (the racial-discrimination); the CED (the disappearance) — the non-refoulement-family obligations through the HR treaties (the removal-to-torture-and-arbitrary-deprivation bars (the U2.2.1's depth)).2. The constitutional face: the rights' application (the territory-persons (the non-citizen's inclusion questions (the Art 3-type text: the "person" wordings)); the detainee's protections (the Art 20's faces — the custody-and-legal-aid application)); the equality's floor; the absence (the no-asylum-right (U4.3's noted gap)).3. The customary core: the non-refoulement's claimed bindingness even without the 1951 (the SC's jurisprudence's acceptance — the U6.4's line). The ECtHR prescribed cases (citedverbatim; the Art-3-type jurisprudence's context):Ireland v. The United Kingdom(5310/71, ECtHR, 13 December 1977) — the five-techniques case (the torture-vs-inhuman- treatment's definitional line) and Cyprus v. Turkey (25781/94, ECtHR, 10 May 2001) — the inter-state case (the missing-persons-and-detention faces) — the Art-3-and-protectionstandards' foundations (read the judgments for the precise holdings; their refugee-relevance through the removal-risk analysis).