7.3 Rights of Poor Country or Duty of Developed Country: Loan or Aid?

The normative debate (the exam's essay-core):1. The poor-country's-claims (the rights' side): the right-to-development's argument (the U3.1.7's face (the cooperation's duty)); the historical-reparations' line (the colonial-extraction's argument (the ecological-debt's complement (the LAW5603-U's climate-justice face))); the 0.7%-GNI's commitment (the 1970's promise (the unmet-record (the few's-compliance (the Scandinavian's face)))); the CBDR-principle (the common-but-differentiated (the climate's-and- the-financing's echo)).2. The duty-vs-charity's line (the legal-status question): the ODA's non-obligation (the sovereignty's default (the no-duty-to-aid (the treaty's absence (the soft-commitment's only))); the counter-arguments (the CESCR's international-assistance-and-cooperation (the 2(1)'s face (the duty's treaty-based-reading (the Maastricht-Principles' extrapolation-lore)))); the HRBA's application (the U4.2's frame (the donor's accountability (the rights-based-aid))).3. The loan-vs-aid (the instrument's debate): the loan's logic (the sustainability's-discipline (the ownership-vs-the-debt (the repayment's moral-hazard face))); the grant's logic (the poverty's-fit (the social-sectors'-grant-rule (the absorptive's realism))); the debt-history's lesson (the HIPC's-and-the-crisis (the odious-debt's debate (the loan's legitimacy-questions))); the mixed-instruments' present (the blended (the guarantees (the de-risking's era (the LAW5709- U's finance-faces)))); the Nepal-position (the DCP's grant-preference (the loan's growing-need (the honest-tension))).