Discuss (b) Field ethics

The HRIA's-define (the impact-tool (the HRDD's-assessment-organ (the 3.2's-18-step's-instrument (the ex-ante (the prospective (the before-and-the-during (the exam's-HRIA-definition)))))))) — The purpose's (the baseline (the before-picture (the affected's-starting (the reference-for-the-after)); the identification (the actual-and-potential (the 18's-core-fulfilled)); the participation (the affected's-voice (the not-the-company-says (the consultation-quality (the exam's-purpose-list))))); **The methodologies' (the exam's-menu): 1. The rights-based-method (the rights-the-lens (the treaty-anchors (the indicators (the affected- defined (the not-the-company-benefit (the difference-from-the-SIA (the exam's-method- core)))));2. The scoping-and-the-screening (the project-map (the rights-likely (the prioritised (the depth- allocated)));3. The data's (the quant-and-the-qual (the affected-interviews (the FGDs (the gender-responsive (the LAW5702-lens (the cross-reference (the anonymity (the protection (the 17+-consent (the exam's-field-ethics)))))))));4. The analysis-and-the-report (the findings (the severity-likelihood (the UNGP-14's-annex (the recommendations (the integration (the 19's-response (the exam's-loop)))))); The EIA-vs-the-HRIA (the exam's-comparison): the environment-vs-the-people (the LAW5603's-EIA (the 2076-Act (the mandatory-for-the-listed (the HRIA-the-voluntary-mostly (the gap (the Nepal's- EIA-not-the-HRIA (the NAP's-HRIA-push (the exam's-Nepal-comparison))))))))