8.4 Prescribed Cases (as listed in the syllabus — cite verbatim)

1. United States vs. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).2. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey vs. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911).3. United States vs. AT&T, 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1982).4. European Commission vs. Google LLC, Case AT.39740 (2017).5. Hoffmann-La Roche vs. Commission, Case 85/76, ECLI:EU:C:1979:36 (1979).6. United States vs. Apple Inc., 791 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2015).7. European Commission vs. Intel Corp., Case COMP/C-3/37.990 (2009).8. United States vs. Visa U.S.A., Inc., 344 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2003).9. European Commission vs. Microsoft Corp., Case COMP/C-3/37.792 (2004).The ten cases' map (one-line, textbook level):• (1) US v. Microsoft (2001): the tying/monopolization appeal — the operating system bundled with the browser; the rule-of-reason analysis of exclusionary conduct in software.• (2) Standard Oil (1911): the historic breakup of the oil trust — the rule of reason's birth and structural remedy's precedent.• (3) US v. AT&T (1982): the consent-decree breakup of the telephone monopoly — the network monopoly's amputation into the Baby Bells.• (4) Google (2017): the Commission's shopping-comparison decision — self-preferencing as abuse (the platform promoting its own service).• (5) Hoffmann-La Roche (1979): the ECJ's foundational dominance judgment — loyalty rebates as abusive by object; the dominance definition's classic.• (6) US v. Apple (2015): the ebook price-fixing conspiracy — the vertical-facade cartel (Apple and the publishers' agency scheme against the…