Unit 3: International Protection of Human Rights
3.1 United Nations Human Rights Mechanisms
The UN’s double machinery: the Charter-based organs (working from the UN Charter’s own authority — the Council, the UPR, the special procedures) and the treaty-based organs (the committees created by each treaty — the states-parties’ creatures). Beside them: the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) — the system’s coordinator and voice; the General Assembly and ECOSOC‘s historic roles; and the mainstreaming mandate (human rights in all UN work — the specialised agencies’ faces: the ILO’s standards, UNESCO’s, WHO’s — International Institutions’ terrain, LAW5405). The design’s logic: the world has no human-rights court of general jurisdiction — so the system works through dialogue, naming and assistance (the reports, the reviews, the visits) rather than judgment.
3.2 Human Rights Enforcement Mechanisms
3.2.1 Charter-based Mechanism
3.2.1.1 Human Rights Council
The GA’s subsidiary organ (2006, replacing the Commission on Human Rights): 47 states elected by region; the sessions’ machinery (the regular and special sessions); the standard-setting and crisis-response roles; the membership’s credibility debate (the rights-abusers’ election problem); the review architecture it owns — the UPR and the special procedures. Nepal’s engagement: elected member (the 2017–2019 term — the record of service the foreign-policy course noted).
3.2.1.2 Universal Periodic Review
The peer-review of all UN states every four-plus years: the state’s report + the treaty bodies’ and special procedures’ compilations + the stakeholders’ submissions; the interactive dialogue in Geneva; the recommendations (accept/note); the follow-up cycle. The UPR’s character: universal (no exceptions), cooperative (dialogue not judgment), but non-binding — the exam’s line: the UPR’s power is the reputation’s ledger.
3.2.1.3 Special Procedures
The Council’s eyes: the Special Rapporteurs, Independent Experts and Working Groups — country mandates and thematic mandates (the independence-and-impartiality fame: the experts serving in personal capacity); the communications (the urgent appeals and allegation letters), the country visits (the invitations — standing vs on-request), the annual reporting. The famous mandates the exam should name: freedom of expression; torture; independence of judges and lawyers; extrajudicial executions; human rights defenders. Nepal’s experience: the visits and the dialogues (including the conflict-era scrutiny).
This is a preview. The complete Human Rights Law notes — full unit, Exam Focus box and model questions — are in the PDF / full version. Get the complete notes →