10.3 The Set's Synthesis (the Comparative Essay)

The arc: from the earlier era's commercial precedents (Dawadi, 2062) through the Companies Act 2063's early practice (Himalayan Distillery, 2068) and the veil's epic (Unity Life, 2069) to the current era's enterprise-and-intermediary disputes (the two 2075 cases) — the corporate world's litigation landscape mapped. The comparison's dimensions: (i) the parties' spectrum (the individual ↔ the enterprise ↔ the intermediary ↔ the regulator ↔ the Government — the corporate law's relational map); (ii) the doctrines' distribution (the veil (Unity Life) at the centre; the registry's powers (Himalayan Distillery); the intermediary's liability (Saraswati Shrestha); the enterprise's ground-level disputes (Pradhananga)); (iii) the regulatory era's evolution (the pre-2063 canon → the 2063 Act's practice → the BAFIA 2073-and-SEBON era's sophistication); (iv) the course's lesson — the separate personality as both the engine (the enterprise's protection) and the problem (the veil's abuse), with the law's answers in doctrine (Unit 3) and institution (Units 6, 8). The supporting verified pair (from the wider Nepali corporate jurisprudence — usable in the body of the doctrine units): Sumargi Parajuli vs. Himalaya Spring Water (NKP 2074, Vol. 5, D.N. 9809, p. 829 — the separate-personality landmark, Unit 3.1) and CIAA vs. Rabindralal Shrestha (NKP 2074, Vol. 1, D.N. 9752, p. 162 — the limited liability's criminal face, Unit 7.4).