Machiavelli separates the question "how should a ruler act" from "how does a ruler in fact keep power". His advice — that a prince must be able to be good but must not be good when goodness loses the state — is usually read as amoral. Read more carefully, it is a claim about responsibility: the person who holds power answers for consequences, not for the purity of his intentions. The uncomfortable question he leaves for lawyers is the one raised whenever necessity is pleaded: who decides what necessity requires, and by what standard is that decision reviewed?
3 Machiavelli: statecraft without illusions
यो उत्तर युनिट 7 मा छ — सुरुवात निःशुल्क, पूरा उत्तर प्याकेजमा।
🔒
यहीँबाट पूरा उत्तर
यो उत्तर Machiavelli separates the question "how should… … बाट अगाडि बाँकी छ। प्याकेज सक्रिय गरेपछि यही पेजमै पूरा पढ्न पाइन्छ — PDF छैन, अनलाइनमा मात्र।
- रु. ३०० · ३० दिन · एउटा प्याकेज
- हरेक विषयको पहिलो युनिट निःशुल्क
- फोनमै पढ्ने, बुकमार्क राख्ने
पहिले निःशुल्क युनिट पढेर हेर्नुहोस् — नहेरी किन्नु पर्दैन।
यही युनिटका अरू उत्तर
- 1 Aristotle: the state and its forms
- 2 Cicero: law as right reason
- 4 Marx: dialectical materialism and class struggle
- 5 Gandhi: non-violence
नोट AI-सहयोगमा बनेका हुन्; मुद्दाको नाम, मिति र धारा पाठ्यपुस्तक र नेपाल कानून पत्रिकासँग आफै जाँच्नुहोस्।