1. The natural-rights line: the inherent-and-inalienable (the person's dignity (the Lockean faces; the UDHR's Article-1 echo ("born free and equal in dignity and rights"))).
2. The utilitarian face: the greatest-good (the rights-as-the-welfare's instruments (the critique: the minority's sacrifice-risk)).
3. The Kantian core: the person-as-end (the never-means-only (the dignity's formula (the CEDAW-and-the-constitutional echo))).
4. The feminist-jurisprudence's challenge (the course's own base): the rights' critique- from-women (the public-private divide (the home's exclusion from the rights' world (the domestic-violence's invisibility-lore)); the abstract-individual (the "person" as the male-default (the law's gendered-history)); the difference-vs-equality debate (the sameness-approach (the formal (the "treat-the-same")) vs the substantive (the difference's accommodation (the special- protection question))) — the MacKinnon-and-the-Okin faces (the names-only citation); the reconstructive-answer (the rights re-gendered (the substantive-equality's turn)).
5. The capabilities' bridge: the Sen-Nussbaum's face (the functioning's real-opportunities (the women's-capabilities list (the Nussbaum's central-capabilities' lore)) — the U-LAW5701-U4 companion).