1. The treaty's mainstreaming: the ICCPR-and-ICESCR (the equality's clauses (the HRC's-and- the-CESCR's gender-jurisprudence (the ICCPR-GR-28's integration-face))); the CRC (the girl- child's face); the CEDAW's specialisation (1.3's depth); the CAT's-and-the-traffic-faces.
2. The interpretation's turn: the gender-mainstreaming (the Beijing's methodology (the every- policy's gender-assessment (the 4.2's depth))); the due-diligence-standard (the state's private- violence duty (the Velasquez-Rodriguez-line's adaptation (the Goebel-era-name citations only))); the intersectionality's jurisprudence (the committee's evolving-readings).
3. The constitutional frame: the Art-38's verified catalogue (the women's own-article: the equal-lineage; the safe-motherhood-and-reproductive-health; the violence-bar-and- compensation; the proportional-inclusion; the positive-discrimination (the 38(6)'s property-and- family-equality)); the Art-42's inclusion-list (the gender-and-sexual-minorities' constitutional presence (the verified text)); the directives' complement (the 51's women-faces).
4. The Nepal's treaty-position: the ratified-set (the CEDAW 1991 (the state's reports' cycle); the OP's status (the honest note: the ratification-record's citation)); the reservation's history- and-withdrawals (the CEDAW's-reservations' story (the inheritance-era reservations' later- dropping lore (the honest hedge when citing))).