Unit 1: Introductory
1.1 Concept, Nature and Scope of Criminology
Criminology is the scientific study of crime, the criminal and society’s reaction to both — the definition’s classic form is Sutherland’s (the study of the making of laws, the breaking of laws, and society’s reaction to the breaking — by name only). It asks three questions: why is conduct criminalised? (criminalisation theory), why do people commit crime? (etiology), and what should society do about it? (penology and criminal policy).
Nature: an interdisciplinary social science — sociology (the science’s backbone), psychology, biology, psychiatry, law, statistics and economics all feed it; empirical and evolving (its theories replace rather than accumulate — the “lively hypotheses” character); both theoretical (explaining crime) and applied (shaping police, courts, prisons).
Scope (the exam map):
- Etiology of crime — causes: personal, situational, structural (Unit 3).
- Criminal epidemiology — crime’s distribution: rates, geography, time, victims (the statistical face).
- Criminal psychology/biology — the offender’s mind and body (Unit 2’s schools).
- Penology — punishment, prisons, corrections and their alternatives (Units 5–6).
- Victimology — the victim’s role, vulnerability and rights.
- Criminal policy and law reform — criminalisation, decriminalisation, evaluation of interventions.
1.2 Sociology of Crime and Criminology
The legal definition of crime (conduct prohibited by the state under threat of punishment — the mens rea/actus reus architecture of Criminal Law, Semesters 3–4) is the raw material; criminology asks what stands behind the legal category. Two sociological stances: the consensus view (criminal law embodies shared values — crime violates them all equally) and the conflict view (criminal law is the powerful’s instrument — conduct of the powerless is criminalised, of the powerful excused). Durkheim’s paradox — crime is normal, bound to every healthy society, even functional (it clarifies values and provokes needed change — by name only) — is the founding sociological insight. For Nepal: the sociological lens explains why the criminalised map tracks social fault-lines — caste discrimination’s criminalisation (the Caste Discrimination and Untouchability (Offence and Punishment) Act 2068), witchcraft-accusation violence, trafficking, dowry — while white-collar and corporate harms have historically travelled lighter paths.
1.3 Study Methods of Criminology
| Method | Core | Classic products (names only) |
|---|---|---|
| Observation (participant/non-participant) | Watching settings and actors | street-gang ethnographies |
| Case study / clinical | The one offender in depth | Lombroso’s criminal anthropology; case histories |
| Survey & interview | Asking populations/offenders | self-report studies (hidden delinquency) |
| Statistical/ecological | Rates mapped by area | Shaw & McKay’s Chicago maps |
| Victimization survey | Asking victims, not police files | the dark figure of crime |
| Experimental/quasi | Interventions tested | “Scared Straight” evaluations (null) |
| Comparative & historical | Across systems and eras | penality’s evolution (Foucault) |
| Cohort/longitudinal | Following lives | career-criminal curves |
| The dark figure: recorded crime (FIR-based police statistics in Nepal) is only the visible fraction — unreported, unrecorded, unfound crime — the methods above exist to see around it. |
1.4 Classification of Crime and Criminal
Classification of crime (the five axes):
- Legal gravity: the common law’s felony/misdemeanour; Nepal’s procedural twins — cognizable vs non-cognizable (police may investigate without warrant vs. court’s leave first), bailable vs non-bailable, and the Criminal Code 2074’s graded offence books.
- Moral standing: mala in se (wrong in itself — murder, rape) vs. mala prohibita (wrong because prohibited — licensing, regulatory offences).
- Actor & target: violent, property, public-order, white-collar (Sutherland’s coin), organized (trafficking networks), cyber/digital, political/state crime, victimless (drug use, sex work — the decriminalisation debates).
- Stages/companionship: attempted, abetted, conspiracy (the general part’s disciplines).
- Nepal’s statutory faces: the Criminal Code 2074’s offence catalogue + the special statutes — Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act 2064, Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act 2066, Caste Discrimination Act 2068, the Electronic Transactions Act 2063’s cyber-offences.
Classification of criminals: occasional vs habitual; first offenders vs recidivists; professional (crime as career); juveniles; female offenders (the gender-ratio puzzle and its explanations); mentally disordered offenders; white-collar; political offenders. The classic typologies (Ferri’s born–insane–passion–occasion–habitual ladder — by name) belong to the positivist era; modern typologies sort by risk, need and career pattern.
1.5 Concept and Goal of the Criminal Justice System
The criminal justice system (CJS) = the state’s organised response to crime: police (detection, investigation) → prosecution and courts (adjudication) → corrections (punishment and reintegration: prisons, probation, parole). Its goals: crime control (suppressing criminal conduct), due process (guilt fairly determined — the two models’ tension, Packer’s names only), doing justice (proportionate, consistent, unbiased), victim redress, and offender reintegration. Nepal’s frame: the Nepal Police (Police Act 2012 B.S.) and the Office of the Attorney General’s prosecution service, the courts (Criminal Procedure Code 2074), and corrections (Prison Act 2019 B.S.; the Criminal Offences (Sentencing and Execution) Act 2074) — with the Constitution’s guarantees as the system’s spine: Art 20’s justice rights (grounds of arrest, counsel from arrest, production within 24 hours, presumption of innocence, fair hearing, free legal aid — Art 20(1)–(10)), Art 21’s victim rights (information, social rehabilitation, compensation) and Art 22’s torture bar.
1.6 Recent Trends in Criminology
- Victimology’s rise — the victim moved from witness to rights-holder (Art 21’s constitutional anchoring; the Crime Victim Protection Act 2075).
- Restorative justice — repairing harm through victim–offender–community encounter instead of state-only punishment.
- Feminist criminology — gendered pathways, the victimisation–offence link (Unit 2.6).
- Green criminology — environmental harms as criminology’s object (poaching, pollution, climate displacement).
- Digital/cyber criminology — online offences, and crime’s migration to platforms (ETA 2063’s offence face).
- Queer criminology and decriminalisation — the criminal law’s retreat from policing identity and intimacy: Sunil Babu Panta vs Council of Ministers and others, Writ No. 917/064, Date of Decision 2064/9/6 B.S., Subject: Identification of Third Gender — the Court directed the State to recognise the third gender (citizenship’s “other” category) and held that same-sex intimacy is not a punishable offence under Nepali law — decriminalisation’s Nepali landmark (see Family Law, Semester 4, for the full arc).
- Comparative, transnational and critical criminology — trafficking, organised crime, transitional justice (Nepal’s conflict-era crimes and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s line — see Public International Law-II, Semester 4), and the critique of imprisonment’s excess (decarceration).
- Evidence-based practice — “what works” evaluations (the risk-need-responsivity family) steering corrections.
Exam Focus
- Definition + nature (interdisciplinary) + the six-scope map.
- Consensus vs conflict; Durkheim’s “crime is normal.”
- Methods table + the dark figure.
- Crime’s five classification axes; criminals’ typology ladder.
- CJS triad + goals + Packer’s two models + Nepal’s statutory frame.
- Trends: victimology, restorative, green, digital, queer (Pant), decarceration.
Model Questions
- Define criminology and explain its nature and scope. (10)
- “Crime is normal… a society exempt from it would require the highest abnormality.” Discuss Durkheim’s thesis. (10)
- Explain the methods of criminological study and the problem of the dark figure. (10)
- Classify crimes and criminals, illustrating each class with Nepali law’s faces. (15)
- Describe the criminal justice system’s components and goals with Nepal’s framework. (10)
- Short notes: (a) White-collar crime; (b) Victimless crime; (c) Sunil Babu Panta; (d) Dark figure; (e) Mala in se vs mala prohibita. (5×4)
📚 Get the complete notes: Download the full Criminology and Penology PDF (all units) — Law Info Nepal Original Notes Series.
