Unit 1: Introduction to Securities Law
1.1 Meaning of Securities
A security = the tradable financial instrument evidencing a claim or an interest: the ownership stake (the share), the debt claim (the bond/debenture), or the derivative’s contract. The functional test (Howey’s investment-contract idea, by name only — “the investment of money in a common enterprise with profits from others’ efforts”): anything sold as a passive profit-promise is presumptively a security and enters the regulation’s net. Nepal’s statutory frame: the Securities Act 2063’s definition-family (the shares, stocks, bonds, debentures, mutual-fund units, and the prescribed instruments — by name, the Act’s schedule-faces).
1.2 Types of Securities: Stocks, Bonds, Derivatives, and Others
- Stocks (equity): the ordinary shares (the voting-and-residual claim — Company Law’s world, LAW5404, this semester), the preference shares (the dividend-and-liquidation priority without the vote), the bonus-and-rights issues (the capital’s own faces), the IPO/FPO (the public’s entry door).
- Bonds (debt): the government securities (the treasury bills-and-bonds — NRB’s auctions), the corporate debentures (the secured-and-unsecured, the convertible faces), the municipal-and-institutional bonds.
- Derivatives: the forwards, futures, options, swaps — the value derived from an underlying (the hedging-and-speculation pair — Nepal’s derivative era: the commodity-era experiments and the SEBON’s structured-products gates).
- Others: the mutual-fund units (Unit 9), the depository receipts, the securitised instruments (Unit 2.9), and the quasi-securities’ borderline cases (the cooperative shares, the “schemes” of the Unity Life type — Unit 9’s lesson).
1.3 Need for Securities and their Regulation
Why securities exist: the capital’s marriage — the saver’s surplus to the entrepreneur’s deficit; the enterprise’s fractional ownership; the state’s borrowing without the tax’s politics. Why regulation (the exam’s fourfold case):
- Information asymmetry — the issuer knows, the investor doesn’t: the disclosure regime’s whole rationale (Unit 4).
- The fraud-and-manipulation temptation — the market’s money attracts its predators (Units 5–6).
- The systemic stakes — the market’s crash as the economy’s fall (the 1929-and-2008 lessons, U1.4-and-U10.5).
- The investor-protection-and-confidence — the ordinary saver’s trust as the market’s oxygen: no confidence, no capital.
1.4 Genesis of Securities Law
The genealogy (by name): the bubble-era statutes (the South Sea Bubble’s aftermath), the US Blue Sky laws (the states’ early-1900s anti-fraud statutes), and the great settlement: the 1929 crash → the Securities Act 1933 (the issuance’s disclosure regime) and the Securities Exchange Act 1934 (the markets’ regulation and the SEC’s creation) — disclosure-as-philosophy replacing the caveat emptor. The UK’s lineage: the prevention-of-fraud acts to the FSA/FCA eras; the common law’s own faces (the misrepresentation-and-fiduciary actions) — and the modern codification’s global spread (India’s SEBI era; the EU’s prospectus-and-MiFID regimes).
1.5 Development of Securities Law and Regulation in Nepal
The ladder (the exam’s dates): (i) the Securities Marketing Center (2033 B.S./1976) — the state’s first broker; (ii) the Securities Exchange Act 2040 (1983) — the first statute and the Securities Exchange Board; (iii) NEPSE’s establishment (2050 B.S./1993–94) — the floor’s opening (1994) with the open-outcry era; (iv) SEBON’s reconstitution (2052 B.S./1995) — the regulator’s separation from the exchange’s operations; (v) the market’s growth-and-crises (the 2063-era’s broker scandals; the 2010s’ bull-and-bear cycles); (vi) the Securities Act 2063 (2006) — the modern regime (the Board’s full powers, the disclosure-insider-fraud prohibitions, the mutual-fund-and-intermediary regimes); (vii) the infrastructure era: CDSC (2067 B.S./2010 — the central depository-and-settlement), the online TMS trading (2018–19), demutualization (the 2019–2021 implementation); and (viii) the current frontier: the second-exchange-and-commodity-exchange approvals, the FPO/rights waves, the retail boom (the demat accounts’ millions), and the corporate-bond market’s adolescence.
Exam Focus
- The security’s functional test (the investment-contract idea).
- The types’ map + the regulation’s fourfold case.
- The genesis line: 1929 → 1933/1934 → SEC; Blue Sky.
- Nepal’s ladder: 2033 → 2040 Act → NEPSE 2050 → SEBON 2052 → Securities Act 2063 → CDSC/TMS/demutualization.
Model Questions
- Define securities with their types. Why are they regulated? (10)
- Trace the genesis of securities law from the Blue Sky laws to the SEC. (10)
- Describe the development of securities law and regulation in Nepal. (15)
- Short notes: (a) Investment contract; (b) Debenture; (c) SEBON’s reconstitution; (d) Demutualization. (4×5)
📚 Get the complete notes: Download the full Securities Law PDF (all units) — Law Info Nepal Original Notes Series.
