LAW5508 Socio-Economic Crime — Unit 4: White Collar Crime

Unit 4: White Collar Crime

4.1 Definition and Concept of White Collar Crime

Sutherland’s definition (1939, refined 1949): “a crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation.” The concept’s evolution: the occupational core (the professional’s abuse) → the corporate face (the business entity’s crime) → the governmental-and-institutional faces (the state’s own wrongs) → the modern umbrella (the economic crime with the trust’s abuse at the centre). The definitional debates: the offender’s status (can the lowly clerk commit WCC?) vs the modus (the deception through the occupational role — the modern preference); the civil-vs-criminal treatment (the regulatory sanctions’ adequacy debate).

4.2 Evolution of White Collar Crime

  1. The early faces — the fraud’s-and-embezzlement’s long history (the trusted clerk’s lore).
  2. The industrial-and-corporate era — the trusts-and-abuses (the monopolies’ wrongs); the railway-and-banking scandals of the 1800s.
  3. Sutherland’s intervention (1939) — the concept’s birth (the criminology’s challenge: the criminaloid — the respectable offender invisible to the criminal statistics-and-theory).
  4. The regulatory era — the securities-and-banking statutes (the US New Deal’s machinery — the SEC’s 1934 world); the consumer-and-environmental regimes.
  5. The globalised era’s scandals — the Savings-and-Loan, the Enron-and-WorldCom (the audit’s failure century), the 2008 financial crisis’ faces (the too-big-to-jail debates), the LIBOR-and-Volkswagen worlds, the modern corruption’s mega-cases (the Odebrecht’s breadth).
  6. The South Asian faces — the banking scams’ era (the loan frauds, the capital-market manipulations); the corporate governance’s reforms’ wake.

4.3 Nature and Characteristics of White Collar Crime

  1. The respectability-and-trust — the offender’s position as the crime’s instrument.
  2. The deception’s modus — the concealment (no gun — the ledger).
  3. The diffuse victim — the consumers, investors, treasury (the harm’s statistics).
  4. The magnitude — the scale’s enormity (the street crime’s dwarfing).

This is a preview. The complete Socio-Economic Crime notes — full unit, Exam Focus box and model questions — are in the PDF / full version. Get the complete notes →

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top