LAW5803 Legislative Drafting — Unit 2: Principles Related to Legislative Drafting

🔒 This unit is part of the complete package (Rs 300) — with the full notes of every unit, the prescribed cases and model questions.
✅ Unit 1 of this subject is free to read: open Unit 1 →  ·  🛒 order the package →
⚠️ AI-assisted notes — please read before you buy. These paid notes are prepared with the help of Artificial Intelligence and then reviewed by us. They are a study aid only — not a replacement for your prescribed textbook, the official TU syllabus or your own teacher, and we cannot guarantee that every citation, section number or case reference is error-free. No refund is possible once the PDF has been delivered, so please buy at your own risk. Read the free Unit 1 of your subject first and judge the quality yourself — place an order only if you understand and accept this.

Unit 2: Principles Related to Legislative Drafting

2.1 Constitutionality of Law

Every draft must pass the Constitution. Article 1 makes any law inconsistent with the Constitution void. The drafter checks: is the subject within the legislature’s power list (federal Schedule 5, concurrent Schedule 7, and the rest of Part 5’s allocation)? Does it respect fundamental rights, including the restriction provisos of Article 17? Is the procedure followed — finance bills only in the House of Representatives (Article 110), passage and certification under Articles 111 and 113? An unconstitutional draft is not law in the making; it is litigation in the making.

2.2 Supreme and Delegated Legislation

  • Supreme legislation proceeds from the sovereign legislature itself: Acts (and the Constitution above them).
  • Delegated legislation is made by an authority under powers granted by an Act — regulations, rules, orders, by-laws. The enabling Act must state the limits of delegation; delegates cannot sub-delegate beyond authority; and delegated instruments must lie before the legislature where the rules so provide. The drafter’s discipline: delegate details, never principles.

2.3 Colorable Legislation

A colourable law pretends to do what it may do while doing what it may not. If a province lacks power over a subject, it cannot take it by dressing the statute in permitted clothing. Courts look to substance, not the title. The drafting lesson: honesty of classification — the law’s operative effect must match its claimed head of power.

2.4 Degree of Criminality and Quantum of Penalty

Penalty must be proportionate to offence: the ladder of criminality (fine → imprisonment → both → grader terms) must map onto the harm’s seriousness. Article 16(2) bars capital punishment. Over-penalizing a trivial breach invites constitutional challenge and enforcement paralysis; under-penalizing a grave harm mocks the victim. The drafter calibrates: maximum, minimum, and the sentencing court’s room.

2.5 Procedural Fairness

A law that affects rights must carry fair procedure inside it: notice, hearing, reasons, appeal. Fairness is drafted, not assumed — the clause designating “opportunity of being heard” and the appeal’s forum is the citizen’s guarantee. Article 20(9) makes fair hearing a constitutional right in adjudication; statutes must build it in.

This is a preview. The complete Legislative Drafting notes — full unit, Exam Focus box and model questions — are in the PDF / full version. Get the complete notes →

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top