🔒 This unit is part of the complete package (Rs 300) — with the full notes of every unit, the prescribed cases and model questions.
✅ Unit 1 of this subject is free to read: open Unit 1 → · 🛒 order the package →
✅ Unit 1 of this subject is free to read: open Unit 1 → · 🛒 order the package →
⚠️ AI-assisted notes — please read before you buy. These paid notes are prepared with the help of Artificial Intelligence and then reviewed by us. They are a study aid only — not a replacement for your prescribed textbook, the official TU syllabus or your own teacher, and we cannot guarantee that every citation, section number or case reference is error-free. No refund is possible once the PDF has been delivered, so please buy at your own risk. Read the free Unit 1 of your subject first and judge the quality yourself — place an order only if you understand and accept this.
Unit 7: Aid Effectiveness
7.1 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
The 2005’s Paris (the aid’s reform- moment): the high-level-forum’s declaration (the ownership-alignment-harmonisation-results-and-the-mutual-accountability (the five-principles’ classic (the exam’s core-list)):
- The ownership (the partner’s lead): the developing-country’s own-strategies (the plans’-and-the-policies’ primacy (the Nepal’s plan-ownership’s link)).
- The alignment (the donor’s follow): the country-systems’ use (the budget-and-the-procedures (the parallel-systems’ avoidance)); the predictability (the multi-year’s commitment).
- The harmonisation (the donors-together): the common-arrangements (the basket-funds (the SWAPs’ sector-wide era)); the division-of-labour’s faces.
- The results (the outcomes’ focus): the measurable-targets (the MDG-link ( the indicators’ frameworks)).
- The mutual-accountability (the both-ways): the mutual-assessment (the transparency’s mutual (the aid’s both-ends’ duty)).
The follow-ups: the Accra-Agenda-2008 (the deepening (the conditionality’s softening)); the Busan-2011 (the effectiveness→the development-effectiveness (the new-actors (the private-and-the-South-South))); the Nairobi-2016’s-and-the-current line (the GPEDC’s forum (the global-partnership’s continuation)); the indicator’s-and-monitoring (the survey-rounds’ record: the uneven-implementation’s honest audit).
7.2 Aid Effectiveness and Nepal
- The aid’s weight (the Nepal’s dependence): the decades’-large share (the development-budget’s donor-component (the historical 20-25-percent-plus-and-higher development-share (the hedge: the year-specific citation))); the loan-vs-grant’s mix (the concessional’s dominance (the grant-element’s erosion-watch)).
- The Nepal’s aid-policy line: the Foreign-Aid-Policy-2002’s era → the Development-Cooperation-Policy-2019 (the DCP (the “grant-first” face (the loan’s tightening (the ODA’s definition’s discipline))); the MoF’s Aid-Management-Platform (the AMP (the aid-portal’s transparency (the publication’s practice))); the aid-in-budget discipline (the on-budget-share’s improvement story).
- The effectiveness’ Nepal-record (the honest audit):
This is a preview. The complete Law, Poverty and Development notes — full unit, Exam Focus box and model questions — are in the PDF / full version. Get the complete notes →