📦 The complete package — every unit, prescribed cases, exam focus points and model questions — is Rs 300: see the packages →
Unit 1: The Seminar Course and Its Framework
Syllabus coverage in this unit
The seminar’s nature and objectives · the seven requirements (subject selection, proposal, supervisor, supervision technique, recommendation, presentation, evaluation) · the evaluation scheme
1.1 The Seminar’s Nature and Objectives
The course’s character: the seminar = the final year’s research course — the student’s own legal research on a definite legal issue, supervised, presented and externally evaluated (the LL.B.’s capstone: the three years’ learning applied to one original study). The objectives (the syllabus’s own): to enable students to undertake research on definite legal issues; to acquaint students with practical knowledge in any area of law on which the student conducts the research — the objective is the researcher’s formation, not a content syllabus (the paper has NO taught units: the student’s own topic is the syllabus).
The research-paper logic (the academic frame): the seminar as the apprenticeship of legal scholarship — the topic chosen, the question framed, the sources searched, the argument built, the paper written, the defence survived: the complete scholar’s cycle in miniature.
1.2 The Seven Requirements (the Syllabus’s Framework)
- Subject selection: the topic must relate to the course syllabus of the 3-year LL.B. (the approved-course boundary — the topic inside the curriculum’s field); the student-and-supervisor’s joint care (the feasibility-and-significance judgment);
- The proposal: submitted to the campus first (the approval gate) — prepared in the suitable format (Unit 2’s craft);
- The supervisor: appointed by the campus after the proposal’s approval — the eligibility floor: the supervisor must be aware of research and have at least five years’ teaching-or-research experience (the competence requirement);
- The supervision technique: the student in contact with the supervisor at least once every fifteen days — the direction received, the form signed (the documented consultation discipline);
- The supervisor’s recommendation: the final recommendation evaluating the student’s dedication, creativity, intellectual capability and originality — and the number of consultations and compliance with the supervisor’s instructions (the process documented, not just the product);
- The presentation: the report presented in the class for discussion — the final shape given by incorporating the useful suggestions of the fellow classmates (the peer-review step);
- The evaluation: the final report (with the supervisor’s recommendation) evaluated — the interview (viva-voce) and the final (external) evaluation (1.3’s scheme).
1.3 The Evaluation Scheme (the Marks’ Map)
The 30/70 division: the viva-voce (interview) = 30% = 15 marks — conducted by a three-member committee appointed by the campus (experts with at least five years’ experience in the legal field, eligible for teaching and research); the final (external) evaluation = 70% = 35 marks — the report evaluated by the subject’s expert, based on the level of creativity and originality.
The pass discipline (the exam’s precision): the pass mark is 35% in each examination separately — i.e., 35% of 15 (5.25 → in practice the rounded threshold) in the viva AND 35% of 35 (12.25) in the external evaluation — the candidate must pass BOTH separately (the “overall pass” does not suffice: the two-gate rule).
The scheme’s lesson: the seminar rewards the process (the supervisor’s documented supervision, the consultations, the presentation) AND the product (the expert-judged originality) — the marks map the whole journey, and the external evaluation’s criteria (creativity and originality) tell the student where the 35 marks’ centre of gravity lies.
Exam Focus
- Long questions: (i) The seminar’s framework (the seven requirements in order — the banker); (ii) The evaluation scheme (the 15/35 split, the two-gate pass rule, the committee’s composition).
- Short questions: the supervisor’s eligibility; the fifteen-day rule; the recommendation’s four criteria.
- Trick areas: (i) The VIVA is 30% (15 marks); the EXTERNAL evaluation 70% (35) — the reversal error; (ii) The pass must be secured SEPARATELY in both (35% each) — the aggregate-pass error; (iii) The viva committee is appointed BY THE CAMPUS (three members, 5+ years’ experience) — the external evaluator is the SUBJECT EXPERT (a different person’s role); (iv) The topic must relate to the 3-YEAR LL.B. COURSE SYLLABUS (the approved boundary — any-topic latitude is the error).
Model Questions
- Explain the nature and objectives of the seminar course in the final year of the LL.B. (10)
- Describe the requirements to be followed by the student and the supervisor in the seminar course. (15)
- Explain the evaluation scheme of the seminar report with the pass discipline. (10)
- Short notes: (a) supervisor’s eligibility; (b) fifteen-day consultation; (c) the recommendation’s criteria; (d) class presentation. (4×2.5)
📚 Get the complete notes: Download the full Seminar and Research Paper PDF (all units) — Law Info Nepal Original Notes Series (LL.B., 3-Year New Course, 2076/077 B.S.).