Unit 1: Introduction to Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property Law
1.1 Concept and Major Forms of Intellectual Property (IP)
IP = the law’s protection of the mind’s products — the creations of the intellect (the inventions, the works, the signs, the designs) given property’s exclusivity for a limited term. The forms’ family: the industrial property (the patents (U2), the industrial designs (U3), the trademarks (U4) — the Paris Convention’s genus) and the copyright-and-neighbouring rights (U5); the newer members: the geographical indications, the layout-designs of integrated circuits, the trade secrets, the plant-variety rights (U6); and the unfair-competition umbrella (U6.6). The constitutional anchor: Article 25’s property right includes the intellectual property (the verified constitutional reference — the IP within the fundamental property’s protection).
1.2 Philosophy and Theories of Intellectual Property
1.2.1 Labour Theory
Locke’s labour-desert (by name): the person who mixes labour with the common owns the product — the creator’s natural right to the mind’s harvest (the author’s-and-inventor’s sweat); the theory’s IP application (the creation’s entitlement) and its critics (the labour’s measure problem; the public’s commons).
1.2.2 Personality Theory
Hegel-and-Kant’s lineage (by name): the work as the person’s extended personality — the author’s will made object; the IP as the personality’s protection (hence the moral rights of U5.3.2 — the integrity-and-attribution as the person’s dignity); the theory’s fit for copyright (the intimate works) and its strain for the industrial-property’s commerce.
1.2.3 Utilitarian Theory
The incentives’ bargain (the Anglo-American engine): the exclusive right as the limited monopoly to incentivise the creation — and the creation’s disclosure-and-diffusion (the patent’s publish-to-protect trade); the theory’s constitutional faces (the US’s “progress clause” by name) and the TRIPS regime’s own logic; the balance’s art: the monopoly’s costs against the innovation’s-and-access’s gains (the public-domain’s defence).
The synthesis (the exam’s frame): the three theories converge-and-compete — the labour’s desert, the person’s dignity, the society’s incentive — the IP statute as their negotiated settlement.
1.3 Meaning, Nature, and Origin of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs)
The IPR’s nature: the intangible property (the incorporeal — the right to exclude, not the thing’s possession); the territoriality’s rule (the national protection’s principle — each state’s grant within its borders (the Paris-Berne-TRIPS bridges notwithstanding)); the time’s bar (the limited terms (U2–U5’s clocks)); the statutory formality’s spectrum (the registration-dependent (patents-marks-designs) vs the automatic (copyright’s birth with the work)); the assignable-and-licensable character (the property’s alienability); and the dynamic balance’s nature (the exclusive-right vs the public-domain’s frontier — the law’s moving line).
The origin’s history: the privileges’ age (the Venetian-and-English patents-of-monopoly; the stationers’ copyright — the censorship’s unintended parent); the statutes’ modernisation (the Statute of Monopolies 1624-and-the Statute of Anne 1710 — by name, the twin foundations); the internationalisation (1.6.1’s line); and Nepal’s own line (1.6’s-and-U2–U5’s faces: the 1936-era’s first Patent, Design and Trademark Act under the Rana PM Juddha Shumsher; the current Patent, Design and Trademark Act, 2022 B.S. (1965) and the Copyright Act, 2059 (2002)).
1.4 Economic Value and Importance of Intellectual Property
The economics’ case (the exam’s list): (1) the innovation’s engine (the R&D’s-and-creation’s financing — the exclusivity’s revenue); (2) the brand’s-and-goodwill’s asset (the marks’-and-GIs’ value — the marketing’s shorthand); (3) the trade’s currency (the IP-and-FDI’s-and-technology-transfer’s faces — the Investment-Law (LAW5709, Semester 8)’s interface); (4) the creative economy’s livelihood (the copyright industries — the music-film-publishing-software); (5) the national competitiveness (the TRIPS-era’s development stakes — the LDC’s-and-the graduation’s faces (Nepal’s 2026-graduation interface)); and (6) the culture’s-and-heritage’s preservation (the TK-TCE-GR of U6.5 — the Nepali stakes: the ayurveda’s-and-the crafts’-and-the folk-arts’ worlds).
1.5 Concept and Sources of Intellectual Property Law
The sources’ stack: the national statutes (the PDT Act 2022 B.S.; the Copyright Act 2059; the supporting regimes (the unfair-competition faces of the Competition-and-consumer laws; the Contract Act’s faces for the licences)); the international treaties (1.6.2’s-and-each-unit’s instruments — the TRIPS’ direct reach through the WTO membership); the Treaty Act 2047’s domestication (the ratified-treaty-as-law (the Constitutional-Law’s interface)); the subordinate rules (the Department’s registration-procedures; the Copyright Registrar’s rules); and the case law (the Supreme Court’s IP line — the prescribed cases’ world; the doctrine’s slow build).
1.6 International Intellectual Property Regime for the Protection of Intellectual Property
1.6.1 Historical Development of Intellectual Property Laws
The international line: the 1883 Paris Union (the industrial property’s protection — the nationals’ treatment-and-the priority’s invention) and the 1886 Berne Union (the literary-and-artistic works’ protection — the automatic protection’s principle); the BIRPI-to-WIPO evolution (the 1967 Stockholm Convention’s organisation — the UN’s specialised agency (1974) of the International-Institutions world); the TRIPS 1994’s incorporation (the IP into the WTO’s trade-law — the enforcement’s teeth-and-the disputes’ court); the internet treaties’ layer (the WCT-WPPT 1996); and the development agenda’s modern era (the Doha-Declaration’s-and-the LDC’s flexibilities; the TK-GR’s instruments).
1.6.2 Major Conventions on IP (Paris Convention, Berne Convention, and WIPO Convention)
The Paris Convention 1883 (the industrial property’s constitution): the national treatment (the foreigners’ equality); the right of priority (the twelve-months’-patents-and-six-months’-marks-and-designs filing window — the first-filing’s worldwide respect); the common rules (the independence-of-patents; the marks’ protection-and-the well-known marks’ faces (Article 6bis); the unfair-competition’s duty); Nepal’s accession: in force for Nepal since 22 June 2001 (the verified record). The Berne Convention 1886 (the copyright’s constitution): the automatic protection (no-formalities’ principle); the national treatment; the minimum standards (the term’s life-plus-fifty floor; the translation-and-reproduction rights; the moral rights’ Article 6bis); Nepal’s accession: 2006 (the verified record). The WIPO Convention 1967 (the organisation’s charter): the promotion-of-IP’s mandate (the cooperation-the-registration-the-dispute services); Nepal’s membership: since 1997 (the verified record — the WIPO member-and-the Paris-Berne parties’ status).
1.6.3 Role and Functions/Objectives of WIPO and Significance of WTO: TRIPS Agreement
The WIPO’s role-and-functions (the exam’s list): the treaties’ administration (the Paris-Berne-and-the PCT-Madrid-Hague families); the registration services (the PCT’s-and-Madrid’s-and-the Hague’s international filings); the law’s development (the standing-committees’-and-the new-treaties’ negotiation); the technical assistance (the developing-and-LDC states’ capacity — Nepal’s engagement); the arbitration-and-mediation (the IP disputes’ ADR); and the information-and-economics (the statistics-and-studies). The TRIPS’ significance (the WTO’s annex): the minimum standards’ all-IP coverage (the patents’-copyrights’-marks’-GIs’-designs’-secrets’-semiconductor-and-variety rights — the U2–U6’s template); the national treatment-and-the MFN; the enforcement’s obligations (the civil-and-administrative-and-criminal procedures — the border measures; the IP-as-trade’s hard law); the disputes’ settlement (the WTO’s DSM — the trade-sanctions’ teeth); and the transition-and-flexibility regime (the LDC’s extended transition (the current-era extensions to the 2030s); the compulsory-licensing flexibilities (the health’s Doha faces)); Nepal’s TRIPS status: the WTO member since 23 April 2004 (the TRIPS-bound-with-the LDC’s flexibilities — the verified record).
Exam Focus
- The IP forms’ family + the Article-25 anchor.
- The three theories’ one-two-three (Locke-Hegel/utilitarian) + the synthesis.
- The IPR’s nature (intangible-territorial-temporal) + the twin-statute origins.
- The economics’ six.
- The international line: Paris 1883 (priority!), Berne 1886 (automaticity!), WIPO 1967, TRIPS 1994 — with Nepal’s verified dates (1997/2001/2006/2004).
Model Questions
- Define intellectual property with its major forms. (10)
- Explain the philosophical theories justifying intellectual property protection. (15)
- Describe the nature and origin of IPRs. (10)
- Discuss the roles and functions of WIPO and the significance of TRIPS. (15)
- Trace the historical development of the international IP regime. (10)
- Short notes: (a) Right of priority; (b) National treatment; (c) Statute of Anne; (d) LDC transition. (4×5)
📚 Get the complete notes: Download the full Intellectual Property Law PDF (all units) — Law Info Nepal Original Notes Series.
