LAW5604 Clinical Law-I: Alternative Dispute Resolution — Unit 4: Submission of Research Proposal and Its Presentation

Unit 4: Submission of Research Proposal and Its Presentation

4.1 Submission of Research Proposal to the Course Instructor/Convener

The proposal’s contents (the one-page-plus discipline):

1. The title (the topic’s precise statement).
2. The research questions (U3.3’s craft).
3. The background-and-significance (the why — the ADR context-and-gap).
4. The methodology (the doctrinal: the sources-and-their-analysis).
5. The tentative outline (the chapters’ sketch).
6. The bibliography’s beginning (the primary-and-secondary lists).
7. The timeline (the clinical course’s own calendar).
   The submission’s discipline: the convener’s format; the deadline’s respect; the feedback’s incorporation (the proposal’s revision — the approved version the working plan).

4.2 Presentation of Research Proposal in the Classroom

The presentation’s craft (the Seminar-I’s shared skills):

1. The distillation (the 5-8 minutes’ frame: the topic-questions-method-plan).
2. The slides’ discipline (the points-not-paragraphs; the citation’s visibility).
3. The delivery (the notes-not-reading; the audience’s eye; the time’s respect).
4. The questions’ handling (the repeat-and-answer; the admission’s grace — “I will consider that”).
5. The feedback’s record (the convener’s-and-peers’ comments noted for the report’s revision).
   The clinical addition: the ADR proposal’s presentation as the negotiation’s practice-ground (the topic’s “sold” to the room — the persuasion’s craft the course itself teaches).

Model Questions

1. What does an ADR research proposal contain? (10)
2. How is the proposal presented and defended? (10)

This is a preview. The complete Clinical Law-I: Alternative Dispute Resolution notes — full unit, Exam Focus box and model questions — are in the PDF / full version. Get the complete notes →